During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
qemu-system-x86_64 -m 8G -cpu host -smp 4 -boot d -cdrom ./output/bootiso/install.iso -hda vm_disk.qcow2 -netdev user,id=mynet0 -device e1000,netdev=mynet0 -serial stdio -enable-kvm
。业内人士推荐WPS下载最新地址作为进阶阅读
您是否想了解更多关于Rocket Lab的最新动态和未来展望？订阅巴伦创始菁英会员，阅读全文。
"It possibly will never happen however everyone needs to know what your wishes are."
FT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition